Oaths of allegiance played a central roll in defining the relationship between rulers and ruled in early modern England.1 They were employed by successive governments to secure the loyalty of their subjects and to flush out potential opponents.2 Beginning with the Act of Supremacy of 1534 and the Elizabethan Oath of Supremacy of 1559, oaths of religious and political loyalty are a regular feature of the history of post-Reformation and revolutionary England. The 1534 oath was tendered to all men over the age of 14 and required the swearer to assert that the children of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn were rightful heirs to the throne. In 1584 the murder of the Dutch leader William of Orange and the uncovering of the Throckmorton plot led to the drawing up of an rument of Association෨ich bound those taking it to give their 鶥s, landes and goodes鮠defence of the Queen.3 The government response to the gunpowder plot of 1605 included the formulation of the Jacobean loyalty oath the following year. The purpose of this measure was to expose Catholics who were actively disloyal to the King. It was not intended to be universally prescribed, and was only to be taken by those persons aged over 18 who were convicted or indicted for recusancy.4 The Civil War years saw a further series of loyalty oaths, notably the Protestation Oath (1641), the Solemn League and Covenant (1643) and the Engagement (1650).5 In taking the Protestation Oath the swearer promised to defend 襠true reformed religion expressed in the doctrine of the Church of Englandᮤ expressed his 崹 of allegiance䯠ᩮtain and defend His Majestyಯyal person and estate, as also the power and privilege of Parliaments졠name="fn6">6 The surviving returns for the county of Devon contain the names of 63,254 subscribers.7
In 1696 the discovery of a plot to assassinate William III resulted in the imposition of the so-called Association Oath, embodied in the 㴠for the better security of his majestyಯyal person and governmentɮ its wording and form this oath harked back the to the 1584 Association: a point not lost on contemporaries.8 Subscribers were to 塲tily, sincerely, solemnly profess, testify and declare, That his present Majesty, King William, is rightful and lawful King of these Realmsd promised to revenge the Kingथath should an assassination attempt prove successful.99> Under the Act of Parliament only officeholders were required to swear the oath, but such was the level of patriotic outrage that in some parts of the country virtually every adult male subscribed to the Association.10 The purpose of the 1696 Association was essentially political: an attempt by the Whig ministry to undermine the Tory challenge and the country opposition more generally. The early eighteenth century witnessed the imposition of a further series of loyalty oaths to successive monarchs. In 1702 an 㴠for the further Security of His Majesties Person, and the Succession of the Crown in the Protestant Line硳 passed requiring all holders of public office to swear the abjuration oath, declaring that 岠Sovereign Lord King William is Lawful and Rightful King of this Realmᮤ abjuring Allegiance or Obedience䯠the young James III.11 Following the death of William III a further Act was passed amending the text of the oath to account for the change of monarch.12 A subsequent Act of the first year of the reign of George I added oaths of allegiance and supremacy, the first binding the swearer to 堦aithful, and bear true Allegiance to his Majesty King Georgeᮤ the second, ostensibly an anti-Catholic oath, condemning as �ous and heretical, that damnable doctrine and Position, That Princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope㯵ld be deposed or murdered by their subjects or any foreign power.13 Jacobite riots of 1715-16 saw unsuccessful attempts to revive the Association to safeguard the protestant succession.14 The final movement to impose a universal loyalty oath occurred in 1723 following the discovery of the Atterbury plot of the preceding two years.